Choose between the Czapek Antarctique Rattrapante and the Frozen Star (Osmium dial). Before you make a choice, please see a video and/or photos of an Osmium dial so you know and understand what it is 😉 Which and why ? And for those curious why I am asking...
Just me - while the Osmium as a material is a unique point that you will have to explain (ad nauseum) to everyone who sees it, I prefer some evidence of what a watch is "doing" and that one is a beautiful implementation of skeleton architecture and it doe...
Lets see a few materials. Here we have tantalum, titanium, sedna gold, bronze gold, and silver. I am a sucker for novel materials, and the Osmium dial is a helluva wow for me. Can you believe, i’d pick an osmium dial over a rattaprante. That is superficia...
By: piccolochimico (aka dsgalaxy1) : December 16th, 2022-14:46
Because it's plain simple. Yep, I've read the magic being the metal, but nearly every dial is better with no date and this one is simply the confirmation. Unless it's a Lange 😅
Honestly need to see them in person. I've looked at these a few times online and the bridge architecture/finishing doesn't quite excite me, but I have determined I'm not as captivated by this modern, dark architecture. I'd say rattrapante because that fit...
The Rattrapante is a bit more sporty than then Osmium dial Czapek imho . Hard to pick a favorite. If i had to choose i would say Rattrapante i think Enter text ...
While I appreciate the technical feat of the Rattrapante, at the end of the day you have other similarly, or even more, technically impressive ie the MB&F. But I admit it’s a challenging choice given how different they are.